Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Comparative Reproductive Anatomy: Evaluating Sources

Introduction

Unlike the library's databases, Google does not filter or rank its results by the accuracy of their claims. Therefore, it is important to be a vigilant fact-checker when investigating sources in your Google search results.

Website Evaluation

When evaluating a website, it's important to consider the following factors. These factors are explained on the link below.

  • Currency
  • Relevance
  • Authority
  • Accuracy
  • Purpose

Lateral Searching to Evaluate Sources

When you are on a website you do not recognize as a trustworthy source, you can perform a "lateral search" by opening a new tab and searching for information about that source on Google. Here are some factors to consider when investigating a source:

  • History of publishing inaccurate information
  • Funding; Profit model
  • Partisan bias

The following are some methods for finding answers to some of these factors:

  • Wikipedia
  • If you are investigating The Washington Times, you can Google: washington times 
    -site:washingtontimes.com to find information about that site from other websites besides The Washington Times' website.
  • If you are investigating a specific claim, you can Google search terms from that claim and include the following terms (site:factcheck.org, site:snopes) to see what fact checkers websites say about that claim.